When I found out a couple months ago that Maggie was coming to Michigan for a wedding, I knew it was a chance I could not pass up. Exchanging frequent and hilarious emails is good, but meeting in person is so much better. Plus, she was coming to a little lake-town on the other side of the state, and before we became parents Bryan and I loved to take weekend getaways to places like that. We figured now would be as good a time as any to start getting back into the habit, so on Saturday morning we packed up the Muffin and drove cross-state to see Maggie and her husband, Phillip.
I would definitely suggest doing this if you ever get the chance.
(Meeting Maggie, I mean. The town was neat, but probably not worth traveling cross-country just to see.)
Camilla loved Maggie and Phillip too. I am muy bummed that they don't live closer. It would be hard for them to babysit for us, living in Seattle like they do.
See how comfortable Milla is? Not only is she not crying, she is reaching for the wine menu, because she knows that Maggie is cool and will not judge her for drinking before noon.
Maggie's post about meeting us is totally un-toppable (and also way too flattering to me), but let me just say that I would drive three hours with a car-seat-hating baby anytime to see her. So worth it. We have just enough in common that we have plenty to talk about, and just enough not in common that the conversation is still interesting.
And we have similar in-laws. 'Nuff said.
See? Milla definitely loved her. Milla does not let just anyone touch her feet.
Actually, I don't know if that's true. *I* certainly don't let just anyone touch her feet, but for all I know Milla herself would be happy to let any random hobo play "This Little Piggy" with her all day long.
Considering how attached she is, however, it's unlikely.
And here is where we move to the inevitable "mama talk" part of the post. (You knew it was coming! It had to be coming!)
I considered writing to Moxie about this question, but the poor woman just started a new job and I doubt she has a lot of extra time on her hands. Sad. But then it occurred to me that I have my own blog, and I can ask my own readers, wise and experienced as they are, to help me.
(And I know you will, because the lure of a blogger asking for advice is a strong one. I know this because I have observed its effect on me. I'll be casually surfing around and come across a post which asks for help with, say, picking out golf shoes. Before I know it, I, who have never been on a non-putt-putt golf course in my life, am Googling "golf shoes best cheap" just so I can have the chance to give advice to someone I don't know. The lure of advice solicitation is THAT STRONG.)
So, my baby. Twenty-three weeks and five days (also known as five-and-a-half months) old. (Insert obligatory "Waaaah, she's growing up so fast" here.)
For the first four months of her life she was fussy and super clingy, and we held her constantly because it was the only way to keep her happy. Then, around four months old, she started being less hyper-needy. She would actually let us put her down and walk away for a few moments. I'm not talking long periods of time here: I was thrilled, for instance, that she was suddenly willing to lie in bed in the morning and chat with her feet while I brushed my teeth and put my contacts in. She would sit in a chair on the kitchen floor and play happily while I completed the more dangerous aspects of dinner prep. That kind of thing.
Bryan and I don't ascribe to any particular parenting philosophy, but the way we interact with Milla looks like attachment parenting in a lot of ways. We sleep with her, we hold her pretty much constantly, we respond immediately to her cries, etc. We developed this way of doing things because it proved to be the best way to keep our high-needs baby happy. She *needed* us to do it. So, when she started being a little less high-needs and a little more chill, I was secretly proud. I thought we'd shown her, by constantly being there for her, that we would be there for her in the future and that she could relax a little. She was secure! She was happy! Responding immediately to her every need had paid off!
But apparently not, because last week it all went wrong again. And we did nothing differently, I promise. Suddenly the girl just has major separation anxiety. Not when we leave her - we never leave her - but simply when we're momentarily out of her sight. I lay her down on the bedroom floor and step into the bathroom to grab a Q-tip, and as soon as she can't see me, it's immediate waterworks. One night recently Bryan took her into the other room to change her diaper, and I heard WAILING. It sounded like torture was going on in there. When he came back to the kitchen with her, I asked him what he'd done. He rolled his eyes. "I put her down so I could wash my hands." Ah, yes. A cardinal sin in Camilla's world.
That makes it sound like we don't care about our poor daughter's woes. But we do care, very much. We're just confused, because it feels like we've reverted to an earlier, tougher stage in Camilla's life.
What I want to know from all you sage people is: did we inadvertently do something that caused this? I seriously can't think of a single thing we changed, but maybe I missed something. Or were we just naive to assume that "better" meant "permanently better"? Is this just one phase of many? She will grow out of it, right?
I need some help here. Or some reassurance. Either is good, both is best.
Okay, okay, one gratuitous picture.
Oh Arwen, she looks so cute up on her hands and belly like that. There's something amazing that happens to their looks when they start to be up that way and you can suddenly see they have necks!
Anyway, I don't have a baby, and so have no right to give advice. I'm sure you're doing an excellent job and God bless you as you cope with her separation anxiety. I wouldn't "ferberize" the poor baby, but I might suggest letting her wail just a little each time and hopefully she'll figure out that you're always going to come back.
Posted by: Anne Cecilia | Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 09:33 PM
Yes, yes...it is a stage and she'll grow out of it (although separation anxiety does peak around 7-9 months typically). She's not old enough to understand object permanence - the fact that you'll be back. Once you're out of her site, to her you've completely disappeared forever. I know that sounds a bit dramatic but she just doesn't quite know that you'll come back yet. Just offer a reassuring voice when you have to leave the room out of her site but still in her hearing range. Don't worry, you haven't done anything wrong. This is just another one of those baby stage things! :)
Posted by: Dooneybug | Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 10:27 PM
Totally a phase. When Genoa was that age, she would scream if anyone other than me so much as LOOKED at her.
The problem can be helped in one word: EXERSAUCER.
Beg, borrow and steal to get one if you have to. She's just the right age for it now.
Posted by: Amanda | Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 11:05 PM
Normal.
and is she working on anything - especially a new physical skill? regressions in any area are common then.
Before she was learning to be secure. Now she's going to learn that she's going to be put down so you can wash your hands and you'll pick her back up and life will indeed go on.
And again - Normal. It will come and go for a long time.
So cut!
Posted by: Tracy | Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 11:13 PM
Cute. C-u-t-e. Not c-u-t, cut. LOL.
Posted by: Tracy | Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 11:14 PM
Arwen,
I treated my first child similarly. The thing is, that with first children, we do tend to respond to their every little cry too quickly. You should just know that you are doing a fantastic job, and I think you ought to have many more children, Lord willing! Beautiful offspring, my dear.
I'm on my third baby. My boys are eight and four, and my daughter is 4 months. We kept our first in our room for a few months, our second with us for two months, and we kicked our daughter out at three weeks. She's become my easiest baby. I wasn't even able to breastfeed my first two because I was full of anxiety and so certain I was doing it wrong.
You are doing soooo well with Camilla. I read your weblog often, and I have thought that you are an amazing young mother - especially this being your first! Being a parent is such a wonderful gift.
What a beautiful family you have!
Posted by: beth | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 12:07 AM
Ditto - normal, though I'm too tired to recall or even google this stage. I think the part to take to heart is that as they get older month by month, they can handle a little more delay in terms of waiting for your still-quick reaction.
But oooh that cutey face! So seriously adorable!
My daughter is at the stage where she is asking for a baby sister. Or brother. Or if she can go buy a cat, lol.
Posted by: Hoo | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 12:32 AM
Totally normal, and a sign she is continuing to develop.
Two things happening: she now realizes you are you, and not Camilla-accessories. In other words, that she is a distinct person from you and Bryan.
And the object permanence thing: she doesn't quite realize you're just around the corner. (Some dogs are like this. You go out the door in the morning for a minute, come back in, and they act the same as when you've returned from an 8-hour day of work. The dog doesn't outgrow it. Milla will.)
Posted by: Cin | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 01:03 AM
I have 2 children and I can assure you that this is completely and totally normal!! Just keep doing what you're doing -- love her, respond to her, etc. and this too shall pass (and then come back again, and pass again, and come back again, and pass again, and come back again.....!).
My kids' fussiness always ramped up when they were about to master a new milestone -- maybe Milla's on the verge of something big!
Posted by: Tricia | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 06:14 AM
"Or were we just naive to assume that 'better' meant 'permanently better'?"
Naive, in desperate need of hope, whatever. You didn't cause this, you can't fix it (not that anything's broken), just do what you need to do and be patient with all parties involved. Don't wonder if you should be doing things differently; keep trusting your gut. I'm not sure that later children are more easy-going because they're used to being ignored. I think maybe parents freak out a teenytiny bit less because they are distracted by keeping the other children alive, and it makes the baby's crying seem less.
The plus side to her single-mindedness is that when you do pick her up after you selfishly use the bathroom or move clothes into the dryer, all is forgiven.
Posted by: Slim | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 08:00 AM
We went through the exact same stage at almost the exact same time. She will grow out of it I promise! Cute pictures!
Posted by: caroline | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 08:56 AM
Camilla is adorable! And yes, like everyone says, her behavior is completely developmentally appropriate. I wish that I could tell you that child development is a nice linear progression, but after 4 kids I can tell you that it's often more of a 3 steps forward, 2 steps back sorta thing. Babies and kids grow and develop physically, then often the emotional development has to catch up, resulting in behavior issues. Separation anxiety peaks at around 8 months old or so - but comes back a bit around 2 years old. In my house, tantrums peak around 3 years old, fade away, then come back for an encore around 5 years old, along with some independence and defiance, which seems to make a re-appearance around 10 years old. Fun, huh? Just a little window into the future for you! :-)
Don't worry - continue doing what you're doing - loving Camilla and making her feel secure - and all will be fine! Just try to enjoy the ride - parenting is such an awesomely fun challenge! :-)
Blessings,
Posted by: MamaJen | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 09:35 AM
One thing I used with my son to get some quick peace (i.e to pee or some other selfish act : ) is to place him in his crib with his mobile running. It gave me about 3 min to run to another room for something sans baby. Also try singing or talking to her as you leave the room and continuing until you return to let her know you're still there, just not visible. Some games of silly peek-a-boo through the door way before you go could make it easier too.
And as another wise woman told me... "it's all a phase and just when you figure them out, they change"
Posted by: Robyn | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 09:38 AM
I don't have children (yet), but I study child development by profession, so I'll bite :) It's very normal and probably has to do with a new physical skill, as others have suggested. When babies start crawling around 7-9 months, separation anxiety is at its peak. You can never hold a baby too much in the first year. By being responsive to her needs, you're teaching her that she should feel safe to explore and learn when she is old because you will always be there. A great resource on socio-emotional development in young children: http://www.zerotothree.org/site/PageServer?pagename=key_social. It sounds like you are doing everything exactly right.
It could be that she is beginning to develop object permanence. In the first few months, babies don't realize a world exists beyond what they see in front of them, so you are in some ways out of sight/ out of mind. She may be beginning to realize that you are just around the corner and testing out the fact that she can elicit a response from you (this is good!). To see where her object permanence is, you can take a favorite toy and put it in front of her until she focuses on it. Then hide the toy under a blanket right in front of her. Does she still reach for the toy? What if it's partially hidden?
Posted by: Katie | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 09:45 AM
Yup, it's just normal separation anxiety. hang in there with your attachment style parenting and by her first birthday she is likely to be more relaxed again.
You're doing great!
Mary, mom to 8, and hoping/prayerfully planning for two more
Posted by: owlhaven | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 11:13 AM
I went out and bought a fantastic book - it was recommended by Moxie, actually. It's called the Wonder Weeks, and it explains the way babies develop different skill sets in predictable time frames, and how they act a bit different (maybe more clingy, maybe more waking up at night, maybe feeding a bit more/less) as they approach the 11, 19, 26, 37, 46, and 55 week milestones. It gives you lists of skills to look for and see if they're developing, games you can do to help them along with it, and how to cope with the resulting "symptoms" of their learning, which really means their little brains are a bit fried from all the learning that's going on. Seriously, it's a great book. Courtesy of Moxie, via me. :)
Posted by: agavi | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 11:42 AM
That last picture is precious. And of course I have no idea what to do with a screechy baby, but you can always ship her off to Seattle the next time one of you needs to wash your hands. Long distance babysitting! (And I love how I can totally SEE Bryan saying that now!)
Posted by: maggie | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 01:20 PM
I recently met a blog friend. She had just moved into my state and drove to the middle of nowhere to be there for me at Princess' funeral. She lives near my parents, so now I have an awesome new friend who really gets the infertility and adoption talking.
Posted by: Lisa | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 01:20 PM
can't...resist...lure...of...advice...solicitation... Um, except I don't know. My firstborn was just like that... she nursed 24/7 for the longest time, had to be near me, hated to go to sleep without me until almost a year old, the whole shebang. The next baby (a boy) wasn't nearly so clingy. I don't think I parented that differently, except of course I *had* to attend to older daughter so I couldn't respond to #2's every cry instantly. But I really think they just have two very different personalities. (and I was very lucky that my super high needs kid came first!). So my not-so-definitive answer is: Some babies are like that. And they have some days/weeks/months where they are extra clingy. Go figure. ;-)
Posted by: Christina/Mrs Broccoli Guy | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 03:33 PM
So normal. My 10 month old is just now starting to get past this. When he was a the height of it, he couldn't stand to see anybody walk in the 'away from baby' direction. If he would see me go past a doorway, he would flip out. Once he freaked out when he saw my husband walking away from him on video. He was sitting in my husband's lap at the time!!!! My technique is just to try to grin and bear it. Sometimes she'll have to cry (hand washing for example) and sometimes you will be able to hold her. Eventually, she'll grow out of it and you'll breathe a sigh of relief.
Posted by: LB | Friday, March 30, 2007 at 09:58 PM
::delurking to play devil's advocate::
::also qualifying this statement by saying that my two daughters are night and day opposites in the personality department::
Babies are creatures of habit. They like the things that they like, and they don't like it when the things they like are taken away. So, in responding *immediately* to her every cry, you've trained her to know that every time she gripes, you'll pick her up. Which is great, except for when it's not.
She's at the age now when she's better able to interact with her surroundings, and she can be left alone for a few minutes to figure out how to entertain herself - bouncing in an exersaucer, laying in the crib watching the mobile go around, shaking rattles, etc. The trick is in teaching her to understand that not being held by mommy doesn't spell impending doom. It's even good for her. Try laying (sitting, propping, etc.) her on the floor and interacting with her from a distance of just a few feet. You're there, but not *right* there. Then, gradually increase the distance. Eventually, she'll figure out that if you go into the kitchen, but she can still hear you, she can play for a minute and be fine.
Alternately, let her fuss or cry for a few minutes (talking soothingly to her all the while) until you finish your task - washing hands, making bed, etc. By letting her go for a minute, but always coming back, you're teaching her patience and building her independence. It's not going to ruin her trust in you, and it's not going to hurt her a bit.
::relurking, having offered my two cents' worth of assvice::
Posted by: Jane | Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 12:06 AM
First of all, I am so jealous that you and Maggie got to meet each other. I want to meet my internet friends. You should come to Boston! We have to introduce the kids anyway, since they're going to get married.
Second, in reading yesterday's edition of "Purple is a Fruit," Linda said she found out at Riley's doctor visit that he's currently growing 8 molars, and that certainly explains his recent behavior. It occurred to me that Camilla might also be teething, and that might be what is making her so clingy. Just a thought.
I'm no expert on teething, though, because I've been thinking that Jack is teething for about 3 months now. No teeth yet.
Posted by: Maureen | Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 07:40 AM
Agree to the "normal stage, object permanence, etc., etc." A big YES to the teething. I know it's annoying to hear about how teething causes everything, but it's actually true. There are all kind of chemical things that go on in a little teething body that just screw everything up! Homeopathic Chamomilla (or Hylands teething tablets) might help a lot. It's totally safe, $7.00 at a health food store.
And I do think it helps to let a baby cry a little and then see that you do come back.
Posted by: Rosie_Kate | Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 09:28 AM
She's normal - perfectly normal! And you didn't do anything wrong to screw her up. It's a phase (like most things) that all 3 of my kids wenth through (5 year old twin and a 2 year old) and I can promise you it will end. It may come back later on, but it will end!
It sounds to me like you are doing just fine with Camilla. Especially the wine before noon - I know that after a long car trip sometimes I need a little pick me up too.
Posted by: Michelle | Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 02:45 PM
Yes, a phase, developmentally appropriate, and yes, she will outgrow it! My daughter was extremely high needs as a baby...she is now a very independent 6 year-old. You are doing an awesome job meeting her needs. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: SHannon | Monday, April 02, 2007 at 02:16 PM
Yep, totally normal. Like some of the other commenters said, possibly teething or the beginning of some separation anxiety. A frustrating phase, to be sure, but a phase nonetheless...hang in there! It will get better.
Posted by: nonsoccermom | Tuesday, April 03, 2007 at 05:29 PM
I thought you might find it interesting to know that in my Integrated Social Sciences class it was explained how the mind of a child works and at her age scientists believe the mind works in such a fashion that when you leave their field of vision (we did not discuss audible)it is as if you are completely gone and consistency in returning to them is the only thing that will eventually (emphasized) make them remain calm and trust your disappearance.
The amusing thing about this class is this was only a small part of it while a class completely devoted to the family here just encouraged women to abort children. I had a class after this woman's class and so I usually sat outside and read (and sometimes listened) to her opinion on the family. A rough synopsis is:
Men are horrible raping bastards.
Childbirth is the worst experience in life (I overheard her saying to the TA after class one day that she did not want to show the students the part of the birthing video where it went well because she didn't want them thinking it could be easy).
Abortions have no long term side effects and are an efficacious means of birth control.
I think I learned more valuable lessons about the rearing of children in the class completely unrelated than the one I sat outside that was completely devoted to it.
Posted by: Rebekah Sloup | Thursday, April 05, 2007 at 11:44 AM